Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 10:06

Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
After Game 4 low, Pacers look to 'dig in' at 2-2 - ESPN
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Mel Brooks is returning for Spaceballs 2 - The Verge
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Smoking Weed and Eating Edibles Share This Surprising Health Risk - Gizmodo
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why do unattractive men assume that a pretty woman like me want them?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
We've Finally Seen The Skyscraper Tsunami That Shook Earth For 9 Days - ScienceAlert
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Weight loss connected to nerve cells in the brain, study finds - The Brighter Side of News